Einstein's Fraud & Worse Exposed

amd

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
864
Einstein's Fraud & Worse Exposed

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NQSv22TD2c

Ninety percent, roughly, of what Einstein is famous for was stolen from Henri Poincaré. Let's go over some of the timelines:

- 1895 At the age of 16 Albert Einstein fails a simple entrance exam to the engineering school in Zurich

- 1896 At the age of 17 Einstein became a high school dropout, his German citizenship is revoked, and he enrolls at the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zurich

- 1898 Poincaré in France writes the paper on the theory of relativity, it wasn't called relativity by Poincaré

So this was written in 1898 by Henri Poincaré, which never mentions Einstein, of course, which Einstein plagiarized as one of his in his 1905 paper without ever citing Henri Poincaré.

By the way, here's a famous true quote from Einstein. Einstein said famously, and is so apropos to this: "The secret is hiding your sources".

In other words, Einstein stole from a lot of different people when he hid his sources and he claimed it as his own.

- 1900 Max Planck and Wilhelm Veen of Deutschland, Germany had developed the quantum theory, which Einstein plagiarized in his "das Lichtquan" or "Light Quantum" paper in 1905. Five years later, citing neither Planck nor Veen

- 1901 At the age of 22, after five years of the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School, Einstein graduated with the lowest grade point average in the entire class, he became a Swiss citizen, and he got a job as a technical assistant in a patent office

- 1905 Philip Eduard Anton von Lenard .. who's Einstein's wife studied under .. received a Nobel prize .. for discovering the photoelectric effect, which Einstein plagiarized the same year as his paper, with no reference to Einstein, none

[ Wikipedia: "Philipp Eduard Anton von Lenard .. winner of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1905 for his work on cathode rays and the discovery of many of their properties. One of his most important contributions was the experimental realization of the photoelectric effect." ]

- There's another one where Sir Isaac Newton talks about the bending of light around the huge gravitational acceleration of the Sun, Einstein is given credit for that. There are actually three people that talk about this at great length long before Einstein ever came around, yet people attribute that to him.

- His Nobel prize for the photoelectric effect .. the explanation of which is entirely wrong, was not a discovery of Einstein, it was stolen from Philip Eduard Anton

Like I said, 90 percent of the stuff that you think .. "e = mc2", that actually first came out of Henri Poincaré, not Einstein.

The only time Nikola Tesla loses his cool, the most gentle person ever, was about Einstein.

So he stole everything from Henri Poincaré, that's three strikes and you're out!

Einstein's own name .. means one stone which is a euphemism for being an idiot: you got one stone rolling around in your head.


Einstein's Travel Diaries Reveal 'Shocking' Xenophobia

The publication of Albert Einstein’s private diaries detailing his tour of Asia in the 1920s reveals the theoretical physicist and humanitarian icon’s racist attitudes to the people he met on his travels, particularly the Chinese.

In China, the man who famously once described racism as “a disease of white people” describes the “industrious, filthy, obtuse people” he observes. He notes how the “Chinese don’t sit on benches while eating but squat like Europeans do when they relieve themselves out in the leafy woods. All this occurs quietly and demurely. Even the children are spiritless and look obtuse.” After earlier writing of the “abundance of offspring” and the “fecundity” of the Chinese, he goes on to say: “It would be a pity if these Chinese supplant all other races. For the likes of us the mere thought is unspeakably dreary.”

Further passages in the diaries, .. while he and his wife were traveling in Asia, Spain and Palestine, and as an aide memoir, see him writing of the Chinese that “even those reduced to working like horses never give the impression of conscious suffering. A peculiar herd-like nation [ … ] often more like automatons than people.”

He later adds, in Rosenkranz’s words, “a healthy dose of extreme misogyny” to his xenophobia with the observation: “I noticed how little difference there is between men and women; I don’t understand what kind of fatal attraction Chinese women possess which enthralls the corresponding men to such an extent that they are incapable of defending themselves against the formidable blessing of offspring”.

“Here, Einstein perceives a foreign ‘race as a threat, which … is one of the characteristics of a racist ideology.


The Travel Diaries of Albert Einstein: The Far East, Palestine, and Spain, 1922–1923

Princeton University Press - May 29, 2018

Albert Einstein’s travel diary to the Far East and Middle East


Amazon product ASIN 0691174415View: https://www.amazon.com/Travel-Diaries-Albert-Einstein-Palestine/dp/0691174415/ref=sr_1_1?crid=G83ABDE6BZSD
 
Last edited:

akgrrrl

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
1,714
Location
Alaska
I really appreciate KWheeler. I learned more about photography/cameras than ever thought possible watching his lectures. Quirky, clever genius. Nice to see other members watch also.
 

akgrrrl

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
1,714
Location
Alaska
I was listening to Dollard when he was living in his car. Another quirkmeister so supremely gifted.
 
OP
A

amd

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
864
General Relativity – A Case Study in Numerology


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBorBKDnE3U

Although mathematics is unnecessary for an understanding as to why cosmology is both logically inconsistent and disconnected from reality, mainstream cosmologists routinely resort to mathematical mysticism in their attempts to justify and impose their demonstrably false dogmatic beliefs.

Revealed are the sacred secrets of tensor calculus and its accoutrements in order to see through the mathematical smoke and mirrors. Anybody with high-school knowledge of calculus is more than well prepared to deal with these matters—the most frightening truth cosmologists must face. After all, calculations themselves are mere mechanical operations that impart no knowledge of their purpose in relation to physics.

Curiously, since it has been proven that neither Einstein nor his followers knew how to do their sums right — hint: they don’t add up — is sufficient to render them a form of numerology, which, like sympathetic magic and phrenology, hinders advancement of knowledge.

00:41.57

So, by the method of "reductio ad absurdum", we assume that Einstein's pseudo-tensor makes sense in mathematics.

We apply a mathematical procedure to it by contracting it.

It produces junk.

What do we know about the premise?

It's junk!

So, that means his conservation of energy is rubbish ― he can't do that ― it's nonsense, the whole
thing is nonsense
!
 

Veritas IV

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2021
Messages
200
Location
USA
Will link an older discussion on the same topic here:


All of this is intriguing info, to say the least.

Also, that Thunderbolts Project is an excellent YouTube channel imho, along with it's offshoot See The Pattern.
 

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
General Relativity – A Case Study in Numerology


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBorBKDnE3U

Although mathematics is unnecessary for an understanding as to why cosmology is both logically inconsistent and disconnected from reality, mainstream cosmologists routinely resort to mathematical mysticism in their attempts to justify and impose their demonstrably false dogmatic beliefs.

Revealed are the sacred secrets of tensor calculus and its accoutrements in order to see through the mathematical smoke and mirrors. Anybody with high-school knowledge of calculus is more than well prepared to deal with these matters—the most frightening truth cosmologists must face. After all, calculations themselves are mere mechanical operations that impart no knowledge of their purpose in relation to physics.

Curiously, since it has been proven that neither Einstein nor his followers knew how to do their sums right — hint: they don’t add up — is sufficient to render them a form of numerology, which, like sympathetic magic and phrenology, hinders advancement of knowledge.

00:41.57

So, by the method of "reductio ad absurdum", we assume that Einstein's pseudo-tensor makes sense in mathematics.

We apply a mathematical procedure to it by contracting it.

It produces junk.

What do we know about the premise?

It's junk!

So, that means his conservation of energy is rubbish ― he can't do that ― it's nonsense, the whole
thing is nonsense
!

There you go ? I came to this thread to post this :): Look at his black hole papers shreds the theory showing the mathematical errors.
 

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
Will link an older discussion on the same topic here:


All of this is intriguing info, to say the least.

Also, that Thunderbolts Project is an excellent YouTube channel imho, along with it's offshoot See The Pattern.
See the pattern rocks! Look at the SAFIRE project. Mind blowing experimental evidence NOT some computer generated theory…

Another cool You Tube is Sky Scholar and Electric Universe Eyes
 

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
Hey @fico off topic but in similar vein…

Have you checked out Fomenko’s work? *mind blowing* at first glance haven’t dug in like with Electric Universe Theory. Apparently history is one big lie. He has spent 30 years using mathematics and studying NASA records and historical evidence to suggest civilization is only about 1000 yrs only.

 

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
General Relativity – A Case Study in Numerology


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBorBKDnE3U

Although mathematics is unnecessary for an understanding as to why cosmology is both logically inconsistent and disconnected from reality, mainstream cosmologists routinely resort to mathematical mysticism in their attempts to justify and impose their demonstrably false dogmatic beliefs.

Revealed are the sacred secrets of tensor calculus and its accoutrements in order to see through the mathematical smoke and mirrors. Anybody with high-school knowledge of calculus is more than well prepared to deal with these matters—the most frightening truth cosmologists must face. After all, calculations themselves are mere mechanical operations that impart no knowledge of their purpose in relation to physics.

Curiously, since it has been proven that neither Einstein nor his followers knew how to do their sums right — hint: they don’t add up — is sufficient to render them a form of numerology, which, like sympathetic magic and phrenology, hinders advancement of knowledge.

00:41.57

So, by the method of "reductio ad absurdum", we assume that Einstein's pseudo-tensor makes sense in mathematics.

We apply a mathematical procedure to it by contracting it.

It produces junk.

What do we know about the premise?

It's junk!

So, that means his conservation of energy is rubbish ― he can't do that ― it's nonsense, the whole
thing is nonsense
!

Here is Crothers’ 2017 talk:
The logical inconsistencies of Standard Model


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zWy6_Mog70&ab_channel=ThunderboltsProject
 
Last edited:

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
Here is Crother’s 2017 talk:
The logical inconsistencies of Standard Model


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zWy6_Mog70&ab_channel=ThunderboltsProject

One of my friend’s comments on the 2017 presentation:

He (Crothers) could have made it a little more accessible by pointing out that a spacial dimension is a static concept, while time is a dynamic concept. They are qualitatively different. He could also have explained the idea behind relativity is to define lengths by the distance light allegedly travels in a particular interval, like a second, because c (the speed of light in a vacuum) was believed to be an unchanging constant.
The logical fallacy is, that you need to know a length (the distance traveled by light at the chosen interval, in this case) to define the speed. You end up with a circular "definition". Furthermore "time", the interval chosen, is based on motion, again requiring a known length. So the idea is doubly circular, and then people wonder, why the theory produces so much confusion ...
 
Last edited:
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals
Back
Top Bottom