MetabolicTrash
Member
I found this on Insta, so it looks like this isn't "conspiracy-esque" stuff anymore -- it's actually getting talked about more and more by the "normies" and people that post here/outside the "fringe." It seems more and more don't simply just see "birth control" as for just avoiding "accidental pregnancy" but a more sinister thing maybe?
Looks like people are started to see this as more than -- as the post says -- "Skittles"-prescribed crap to give women to screw up their natural hormones -- and as some have pointed out masculinize them. You think you're "preventing pregnancy" as if a woman can just get knocked up at a moment's notice if a penis of any man accidentally is within five feet of her ... yeah, sure. As if you couldn't brainwash females enough ... Well, you can certainly make them more in the palm of your hands when the very same pills that are "good" to prevent pregnancy also make young women more likely to have maybe PCOS, metabolic issues, mood issues & mental ones alike (not hard to see this IRL).
Even this old post over ten years ago delves in to how birth control can affect populations and people all around -- namely by sexual selection, a VERY powerful driving force in QOL in both sexes. You can't argue that women's health wouldn't affect men's -- that'd be like thinking changes of flowers wouldn't affect bees, or etc.:
The Pill Makes Women Pick Bad Mates
In other words they pick similar vs. dissimilar, however you want to define that anyways. Many in the blackpill/incel spheres talk of "oofy doofy" AKA women preferring feminine men over "masc." ones. They talk about how the trend seems dysgenic -- riding on birth control like hormonal candy can surely make for weird consequences or turning events in how women act+how this affects men. This may sound "selfish" but men & women operate in society together -- therefore women's health will affect men's obviously. Yet vehement "feminists" will cry & claim it's their "right" to poison themselves & destroy their health which -- consequently -- affects everyone else too.
Is this maybe an explanation for why there's a rising sexlessness among youth? Trends show younger people having sex less -- mostly male it seems but it does show it affects females too. Perhaps "contraceptions" are really experimental tools to weaken, heighten, or just make female sex drive abnormal/"out of sync" to skew sexual selection among humans? Since many female species are the "sexual selectors" -- or as some have even posited -- the "gatekeepers" then imagine when you funk with this and its implications on birth rates, dysgenics, epigenetics & general health from future born-s while millions of women are in an abnormal hormonal "wave" unlike what "optimal" nature bestows.
Is the Sex Recession Turning into a Great Sex Depression?
Women are out earning/educated/successful/etc. than men now -- and more men are dropping out of the rat race slowly but surely, notably younger ones. Could this be dat dere "masculine" behavior? Gals normally want handsome, powerful, strong, "fit" males, right? Well, when you're wealthy & powerful & hormonally manipulated, which guys are the "fit" ones? If you flip the script or alter the confines as to what constitutes female-male dynamics in nature then you get weird results like women or females as new "forms" of privileged semi-males -- or more males becoming weaker, less handsome/less "fit" & less privileged semi-females. Both lose, but us guys seem to have it worse now.
Perhaps increasing "hookup culture" female participants is just semi-unnaturally driven/affected? Something not exactly "natural" even if polygamy still rules. The difference between "hookup culture" & "normal" or more polygamous mating structures might simply boil down to a more tone/balanced sexual drive & health vs. BC's "effects."
Possibly also relevant:
Interestingly it seems the incels were actually right all along ... But now they've been proven "wrong" but in the worst ways possible, i.e., trading one unfortunate reality for a more unproductively unfortunate situation AKA turning it from an alpha/beta issue to a women's health affecting everything else issue -- not to mention endless other health downfalls everyone faces to begin with. When incels spoke of the 'Virgin vs. Chad' it seemed "crazy" ... Well, that seems better than the bizarre-ness we are inching in to now....
*Drumroll please...*
Hmmm ... Sounds familiar? Let's ask our "friend" Google what they think:
Initiated by.....???
The Breaking Point: Why Do Women Initiate Divorce More Than Men?
Are college-educated women more likely to be on/have been on the pill, which might explain their getting married to these "oofy doofy" guys with financial stability, only to then have it all plummeting down to zero due to their position not being satisfactory? Maybe it has to do with some odd masculine-feminine twist/"role" shift ... Ya?
Perhaps the women become masculine, so they don't want to be tied down to "oofy" forever. The pill might make them bored of the guy easily/wanna switch him since evidently there's some data to suggest these guys chosen aren't necessarily desirable to naturally cycling females. If they become "masculine" then maybe they inch in to masculine things like ... A shift in sexual behaviors, encounters, satisfaction, etc.? Maybe she wants to play the field? Maybe impregnate some dudes/dudettes?
The ironic part is selling this idea that girls all need this because they may "accidentally get pregnant." I don't know about any of you, but I've never heard of "accidental pregnancy." In most cases it's VERY MUCH INTENTIONAL, even if in an "indirect" sorta way. "Accidental pregnancy" is almost a laughable concept ... Accident?
But if this alone isn't bad enough, how about this/the following?
Birth-control pills could add 10 million doses of hormones to our wastewater every day. Some of that estrogen may wind up in our taps..
Also some other normie stuff to ponder over:
Perhaps the idea is to change young girls' hormones somehow in a way that's catastrophic? If the pill "masculinizes" them then -- consequently -- it's a sort of paradigm shift in sexual selection pressures and beyond. Maybe this is to curb the "alphas" more? Maybe it's a clever mechanism to shift the mating order, along with also having malice in female health (and again the consequent effects this'll have on society at large, including males). If this really is "dysgenic" as some of the incels claim then it's only common sense -- "picking the wrong mate" is akin to seeing BC as some sort of haze or psyop-type protocol to mess with human sexual selection which can have effects MASSIVELY everywhere down the line. If you think just altering "sex preferences" is harmless then perhaps you're not aware that the motive biologically for most is to engage in sex, even if not the sole or only purpose in life. Something such as altering mating choices/etc. can't be seen as innocent or "harmless" + can't claim ignorance either by "elites" AKA, "We didn't know of these things!" Johnson & Johnson, anyone?
I have NO IDEA how many females use birth control, or have used it (& whether even just temporarily using it can alter women/females forever). And the real kicker -- even if there're females NOT using it, is such widespread use of it enough to still affect some non-users as well (& their mate preferences/health)?
Looks like people are started to see this as more than -- as the post says -- "Skittles"-prescribed crap to give women to screw up their natural hormones -- and as some have pointed out masculinize them. You think you're "preventing pregnancy" as if a woman can just get knocked up at a moment's notice if a penis of any man accidentally is within five feet of her ... yeah, sure. As if you couldn't brainwash females enough ... Well, you can certainly make them more in the palm of your hands when the very same pills that are "good" to prevent pregnancy also make young women more likely to have maybe PCOS, metabolic issues, mood issues & mental ones alike (not hard to see this IRL).
Even this old post over ten years ago delves in to how birth control can affect populations and people all around -- namely by sexual selection, a VERY powerful driving force in QOL in both sexes. You can't argue that women's health wouldn't affect men's -- that'd be like thinking changes of flowers wouldn't affect bees, or etc.:
The Pill Makes Women Pick Bad Mates
For the non-pill users, results didn't show a significant preference for similar or dissimilar MHC odors. When women started taking birth control, their odor preferences changed. These women were much more likely than non-pill users to prefer MHC-similar odors.
In other words they pick similar vs. dissimilar, however you want to define that anyways. Many in the blackpill/incel spheres talk of "oofy doofy" AKA women preferring feminine men over "masc." ones. They talk about how the trend seems dysgenic -- riding on birth control like hormonal candy can surely make for weird consequences or turning events in how women act+how this affects men. This may sound "selfish" but men & women operate in society together -- therefore women's health will affect men's obviously. Yet vehement "feminists" will cry & claim it's their "right" to poison themselves & destroy their health which -- consequently -- affects everyone else too.
The pill puts a woman's body into a hormonally pregnant state (the reason she doesn’t ovulate), and during that time there would be no reason to seek out a mate.
Is this maybe an explanation for why there's a rising sexlessness among youth? Trends show younger people having sex less -- mostly male it seems but it does show it affects females too. Perhaps "contraceptions" are really experimental tools to weaken, heighten, or just make female sex drive abnormal/"out of sync" to skew sexual selection among humans? Since many female species are the "sexual selectors" -- or as some have even posited -- the "gatekeepers" then imagine when you funk with this and its implications on birth rates, dysgenics, epigenetics & general health from future born-s while millions of women are in an abnormal hormonal "wave" unlike what "optimal" nature bestows.
Is the Sex Recession Turning into a Great Sex Depression?
Women are out earning/educated/successful/etc. than men now -- and more men are dropping out of the rat race slowly but surely, notably younger ones. Could this be dat dere "masculine" behavior? Gals normally want handsome, powerful, strong, "fit" males, right? Well, when you're wealthy & powerful & hormonally manipulated, which guys are the "fit" ones? If you flip the script or alter the confines as to what constitutes female-male dynamics in nature then you get weird results like women or females as new "forms" of privileged semi-males -- or more males becoming weaker, less handsome/less "fit" & less privileged semi-females. Both lose, but us guys seem to have it worse now.
Perhaps increasing "hookup culture" female participants is just semi-unnaturally driven/affected? Something not exactly "natural" even if polygamy still rules. The difference between "hookup culture" & "normal" or more polygamous mating structures might simply boil down to a more tone/balanced sexual drive & health vs. BC's "effects."
Record High Number Of People Are Not Having Sex, The Young Lead The Pack
Yet another study that corroborates the striking decline of health in Western nations, except that this time it is not physiological disease. The "Young" Have Now Become The Old This new study found that a record high number of people is not having ANY sex, with the most pronounced "sex drought"...
raypeatforum.com
Possibly also relevant:
Heart Attacks Are On The Rise Among Young Women
The bad news for the "young" just keep on coming. As I posted last week, the chronologically young do appear to have become the biological old. The "Young" Have Now Become The Old This week, the front page news is that heart attacks in young women have seen the largest increase than any other...
raypeatforum.com
Interestingly it seems the incels were actually right all along ... But now they've been proven "wrong" but in the worst ways possible, i.e., trading one unfortunate reality for a more unproductively unfortunate situation AKA turning it from an alpha/beta issue to a women's health affecting everything else issue -- not to mention endless other health downfalls everyone faces to begin with. When incels spoke of the 'Virgin vs. Chad' it seemed "crazy" ... Well, that seems better than the bizarre-ness we are inching in to now....
Can Birth Control Affect Who You're Attracted To?
In this guest post, Dr. Sarah Hill discusses how birth control might influence the types of men that women are attracted to.
drbrighten.com
Preference for mates more genetically similar to use when based on scent
Choosing your partner on the pill may result in less longterm attraction and sexual satisfaction
Women using hormonal birth control may preferentially select a mate based more on financial stability then based on attraction
*Drumroll please...*
Women on the pill may be more likely to initiate divorce
Hmmm ... Sounds familiar? Let's ask our "friend" Google what they think:
Almost 50 percent of all marriages in the United States will end in divorce or separation.
Initiated by.....???
The Breaking Point: Why Do Women Initiate Divorce More Than Men?
A 2015 study by the American Sociological Association found that women initiate two-thirds of all divorces, a staggering 69% to be exact. College-educated women initiate divorce at an even higher rate: 90%.
Are college-educated women more likely to be on/have been on the pill, which might explain their getting married to these "oofy doofy" guys with financial stability, only to then have it all plummeting down to zero due to their position not being satisfactory? Maybe it has to do with some odd masculine-feminine twist/"role" shift ... Ya?
Perhaps the women become masculine, so they don't want to be tied down to "oofy" forever. The pill might make them bored of the guy easily/wanna switch him since evidently there's some data to suggest these guys chosen aren't necessarily desirable to naturally cycling females. If they become "masculine" then maybe they inch in to masculine things like ... A shift in sexual behaviors, encounters, satisfaction, etc.? Maybe she wants to play the field? Maybe impregnate some dudes/dudettes?
The ironic part is selling this idea that girls all need this because they may "accidentally get pregnant." I don't know about any of you, but I've never heard of "accidental pregnancy." In most cases it's VERY MUCH INTENTIONAL, even if in an "indirect" sorta way. "Accidental pregnancy" is almost a laughable concept ... Accident?
But if this alone isn't bad enough, how about this/the following?
Birth-control pills could add 10 million doses of hormones to our wastewater every day. Some of that estrogen may wind up in our taps..
- Hormones from birth-control pills can travel through showers, toilets, and washing machines to local wastewater facilities.
- In his book, "Troubled Water," activist Seth Siegel writes that birth-control pills add more than 10 million doses of synthetic estrogen to US wastewater every day.
- From there, the hormones could get discharged into rivers and lakes that serve as sources of drinking water.
Also some other normie stuff to ponder over:
Why are sperm counts falling? 'Contraceptives and plastics'
Washington scientists say the sex hormone oestradiol - the birth control hormone that passes untreated through sewage plants - has an even larger effect on sperm than Bisphenol A or BPA.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Worrying: Two years ago, a large Spanish study warned that sperm counts are falling at an alarming rate - up to 38 per cent in a decade - with diet and lifestyle largely to blame
Birth Control in Drinking Water: A Fertility Catastrophe in the Making?
Fish struggle to fertilize eggs three generations after exposure to contraceptive hormone, raising questions about the effects on humans.
www.ncregister.com
Fish struggle to fertilize eggs three generations after exposure to contraceptive hormone, raising questions about the effects on humans.
Perhaps the idea is to change young girls' hormones somehow in a way that's catastrophic? If the pill "masculinizes" them then -- consequently -- it's a sort of paradigm shift in sexual selection pressures and beyond. Maybe this is to curb the "alphas" more? Maybe it's a clever mechanism to shift the mating order, along with also having malice in female health (and again the consequent effects this'll have on society at large, including males). If this really is "dysgenic" as some of the incels claim then it's only common sense -- "picking the wrong mate" is akin to seeing BC as some sort of haze or psyop-type protocol to mess with human sexual selection which can have effects MASSIVELY everywhere down the line. If you think just altering "sex preferences" is harmless then perhaps you're not aware that the motive biologically for most is to engage in sex, even if not the sole or only purpose in life. Something such as altering mating choices/etc. can't be seen as innocent or "harmless" + can't claim ignorance either by "elites" AKA, "We didn't know of these things!" Johnson & Johnson, anyone?
I have NO IDEA how many females use birth control, or have used it (& whether even just temporarily using it can alter women/females forever). And the real kicker -- even if there're females NOT using it, is such widespread use of it enough to still affect some non-users as well (& their mate preferences/health)?
Last edited: