J
jb116
Guest
The logic isn't sound when you think of the whole picture. Gas is flammable, should we not use it for fuel in our cars?
For every negative effect taken out of context, the proper use of any fuel in biology or automobiles could of course come across as looking evil. But the whole picture dictates what the best approach is. What's more reasonable is probably using sugar to spare protein, lots of B Vitamins regimented, especially b1 and b3, essentially low or no fat, and aspirin. Some sugar will be used but the more and more oxidative metabolism is restored; the more pyruvate dehydrogenase is replenished and the more free fatty acids can be inhibited, the better the tides can turn for sugar towards being anti-cancerous.
For every negative effect taken out of context, the proper use of any fuel in biology or automobiles could of course come across as looking evil. But the whole picture dictates what the best approach is. What's more reasonable is probably using sugar to spare protein, lots of B Vitamins regimented, especially b1 and b3, essentially low or no fat, and aspirin. Some sugar will be used but the more and more oxidative metabolism is restored; the more pyruvate dehydrogenase is replenished and the more free fatty acids can be inhibited, the better the tides can turn for sugar towards being anti-cancerous.