visionofstrength
Member
I have seen that, just recently. The citations alone were worth the price of admission, but like Charlie, he doesn't seem to monetize. I found his thinking about Peat interesting, if only because he describes it as so much of a work-in-progress. It seems like he at least thinks he disagrees with Peat, or will someday, when his work is done. That's sometimes the sign of a good student, probing and tweaking the teacher.Filip1993 said:@Visionofstrength Have you read Edwards blog? I know he was banned from here but I think you might like some of his stuff. http://edwardjedmonds.com
EDIT: Is it okey to post this here btw?
Had I been a member here when he was, I would have enjoyed rousing a defense of Peat, as I try to now whenever it seems Peat is tweaked, even by his students. I mean, not that it takes much to defend Peat. His work really just speaks for itself.
In just one example, if one wants to cite studies on harmful effects of fructose, then one needs to look for studies that use controls where unsaturated fats have been eliminated, since any putative harmful effects of fructose, like those of ethanol, may be caused (in Peat's view) by even small amounts of PUFAs.
But if (as I assume) a habit for name-calling was the offense that got him voted off by the 4 mods? then perhaps his own blog is a better forum.
Thanks for pointing to that, f. Appreciate it.