Vitamin E reduces exercise-induced muscle damage

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
Nothing much to add here and the article title is essentially identical to my post. I am mostly posting this as a possible "remedy" for the many people who engage in endurance exercise, usually with the (misguided) goal to lose weight. As the study says, the effects of vitamin E are most pronounced in such activities and I think the two main mechanisms of action are the ability of vitamin E to limit lipolysis, as well as its effects on limiting the peroxidation of PUFA, which is the dominant type of fat released in circulation due to lipolysis. Another interesting finding was that daily doses above 500 IU were less effective than doses at or below 500 IU daily, which corroborates prior human studies showing that most humans cannot utilize doses of vitamin E higher than 500 IU - 750 IU daily. Another possible explanation is that higher vitamin E doses interfere with vitamin K absorption and utilization from food and vitamin K is also a known factor in muscle health.

Can Low-Dose of Dietary Vitamin E Supplementation Reduce Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Oxidative Stress? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials - PubMed
Vitamin E supplementation reduces exercise-induced muscle damage

"...A team of Korean researchers have published a Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) that suggested low dosages of dietary vitamin E supplementation may significantly reduce the oxidative stress and muscle damage brought on by exercise. In this article, 17 RCTs were chosen among 44 studies with comparable markers, measurement frequencies, and valid exercise protocols. The investigations assessed biomarkers such as creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), malondialdehydes (MDA), total antioxidant status (TAS) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Dietary vitamin E supplementation's impact on exercise-induced muscle damage was investigated using CK and LDH concentrations. They discovered that vitamin E supplementation had a significant impact on muscle damage immediately after exercise. Furthermore, low dosages of vitamin E supplementation (500 IU daily) exhibited a protective impact against muscle damage, whereas high doses (>500 IU daily) had no such effect. Additionally, vitamin E supplementation had a positive effect on athletes' CK concentrations while having no positive impact on non-athlete participants."

"...Vitamin E is made up of two broad members – tocopherols and tocotrienols. Tocotrienols have also been shown to improve endurance capacity as indicated by a longer duration of swimming and reduce exercise induced oxidative stress. As such, vitamin E supplementation has demonstrated potential in mitigating exercise-induced muscle damage. By scavenging free radicals and reducing lipid peroxidation, full spectrum vitamin E (d-mixed tocopherols + d-mixed tocotrienols) may help minimise oxidative damage to muscle tissues. This effect is particularly relevant for endurance athletes who engage in prolonged, strenuous and repetitive exercise, as they are more prone to muscle damage caused by oxidative stress,” said Dr Ariati Aris, Scientific Affairs Specialist at PhytoGaia."
 
Last edited:

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
doses above 500 IU did not add further benefit,
The part you quoted actually said it did not have "such an effect" (reffering to a protective effect). So it sounds like was ineffective at the dosage. Which begs the question: why?
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
The part you quoted actually said it did not have "such an effect" (reffering to a protective effect). So it sounds like was ineffective at the dosage. Which begs the question: why?

I think the higher dose had an effect, it as just less pronounced than the lower dose. I will change the wording to say "less effective" than lower dose. As I say in my edit, it could be that higher vitamin E doses deplete vitamin K and/or interfere with its absorption (the latter has been demonstrated already) from food, and lower vitamin K may negate many of the benefits vitamin E provides.
"... The results in this study showed that lower dosage of vitamin E supplementation (≤500 IU) had greater protective effects. Finally, our results showed a complementary relationship among exercise-induced muscle damage, oxidative stress, and inflammation by confirming the results at once."
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
I think the higher dose had an effect, it as just less pronounced than the lower dose. I will change the wording to say "less effective" than lower dose. As I say in my edit, it could be that higher vitamin E doses deplete vitamin K and/or interfere with its absorption (the latter has been demonstrated already) from food, and lower vitamin K may negate many of the benefits vitamin E provides.
"... The results in this study showed that lower dosage of vitamin E supplementation (≤500 IU) had greater protective effects. Finally, our results showed a complementary relationship among exercise-induced muscle damage, oxidative stress, and inflammation by confirming the results at once."
That could actually be. Paradoxically Vitamin K has some decent anti-oxidant effects, although it's actually a pro-oxidant.
 

Ismail

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2020
Messages
714
higher vitamin E doses deplete vitamin K and/or interfere with its absorption (the latter has been demonstrated already) from food, and lower vitamin K may negate many of the benefits vitamin E provides.

How far apart do they need to be taken to avoid any negation from one another?

I was upon the understanding that taking vitamins and/or antioxidants immediately before and/or after exercise diminishes the stress induced adaption benefits, do you know much about this @Mauritio ?

I came across this earlier today and was absolutely fascinated with this Dr's research into tocotrienols:


View: https://youtu.be/hPmXNXmkfHg?si=K96P-fdH0IPKTdV-


The doc also mentions very quickly and briefly that tocopherols (I think he was referring to d-alpha tocopherol) doesn't "leave" the body, which was a little concerning.
 

Mauritio

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Messages
5,669
How far apart do they need to be taken to avoid any negation from one another?

I was upon the understanding that taking vitamins and/or antioxidants immediately before and/or after exercise diminishes the stress induced adaption benefits, do you know much about this @Mauritio ?

I came across this earlier today and was absolutely fascinated with this Dr's research into tocotrienols:


View: https://youtu.be/hPmXNXmkfHg?si=K96P-fdH0IPKTdV-


The doc also mentions very quickly and briefly that tocopherols (I think he was referring to d-alpha tocopherol) doesn't "leave" the body, which was a little concerning.

Ive heard this before and Im not sure how this would fit into the bioenergetic view. Since there is growth caused by inflammation and growth factors like HGH and estrogen, but there is also (muscle) growth caused by testosterone or anti-cortisol agents, so is inflammation really needed for muscle growth?

Why would it be concerning if they dont leave the body, if they leave they can't do any work :D
 

Ismail

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2020
Messages
714
Ive heard this before and Im not sure how this would fit into the bioenergetic view. Since there is growth caused by inflammation and growth factors like HGH and estrogen, but there is also (muscle) growth caused by testosterone or anti-cortisol agents, so is inflammation really needed for muscle growth?
Never thought of it like that to be honest, good point nevertheless, thank you 🙏
Why would it be concerning if they dont leave the body, if they leave they can't do any work :D
Lol! True! It’s just the way Dr Barrie conveyed that point, it seemed to be “negative” and not a good thing, however unfortunately he didn’t expound upon his thought process behind it etc.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom