You are so wrong Tank https://www.tmrjournals.com/public/articlePDF/20221114/483e983160eb24f1ef94bdd666603ac9.pdfSo, Danny asked if the mythical "Spike Protein" could be seen in detectable levels in the unvaxxed who hung around the vaxxed, and Nick agreed this might happen. This is also the core of all the "shedding" concerns for most people (although, there are other potential mechanisms). It's certainly the mechanism that the disciples of shedding espouse, the likes of Tenpenny and McCullough and Fleming and such.
There's only one problem with this theory..... even the vaxxed, shortly after taking the shot, have minimal detectable levels of this mythical "Spike protein" for about two weeks after taking the first shot (not the second). Of course, these are small studies, involving only about 10 healthcare workers, but they had about 20 blood draws over a two month period.
This mythical "Spike Protein" was only detectable in picogram per milliliter amounts for about two weeks, and then became totally undetectable. It doesn't even seem, like at peak "Spike Protein" production, that there would be enough of this mythical protein to spread to another (at least though casual contact), let alone after two weeks, when it isn't even detectable.
This is the core problem with the entire "shedding" theory, and especially, the "shed disciples..." Lot's of fear pron, no hard data to back it up. Why aren't the likes of Tenpenny and Fleming and McCullough doing studies to prove this concept, in regards to the "Spike Protein" shedding, is even possible? Wouldn't it be a simple matter of some blood draws before and after hanging around some of the freshly vaxxed? Or, a trial with some mice or rats?
Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike producedbyanti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products