Pros: turbo pufa depletionYou can try to convince me by explaining the pros and cons.
Cons: ???
I've no idea. Hopefully somebody more knowledgeable chimes in
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Pros: turbo pufa depletionYou can try to convince me by explaining the pros and cons.
I think it's a disproportionate response equivalent to exercising the nuclear option.Pros: turbo pufa depletion
Cons: ???
I've no idea. Hopefully somebody more knowledgeable chimes in
Thank you for your good insights. I get most/all of my pufa from the extra dark chocolate I eat daily. I know it is bad to eat the kind that has soy lecithin although I probably wont be changing so hopefully the Vit-E 400-IU d-alpha tocopheral I take once or twice daily along with 2 aspirin once daily has helped. Fat free is impossible as I am already too slim to do no fat. Whole milk seems to be what keeps my hair healthy unless I eat plenty of beef daily and I dont have time. You are very helpful.Good points.
There are two camps then, as I see it, w/r to dealing with PUFA stores in the body on the way to getting rid of them as much as possible.
Both agree on going cold turkey on PUFA in order to keep from accumulating more, or trying as much since we can't avoid it totally. With the goal of eventually having low enough PUFA FFAs in the blood that does not interfere significantly with sugar metabolism and low oxidative stress from the prevention of lipid peroxidation.
Option X involves taking aspirin and niacinamide for the purpose of inhibiting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation.
Option Y involves none of that.
Option X gives instant results as far as improving sugar metabolism while Option Y requires waiting 4 years.
Option Y allows one to get rid of PUFA stores in a big way (significant doesn't have that impact) after 4 years of slowly using it up daily while with Option X more PUFA stores remain.
During the 4 years, Option X minimizes lipid peroxidaton while Option Y doesn't. Though after 4 years, the situation changes as with Option Y, there is a lot of PUFA stores reduction, and Option Y begins to have less PUFA fatty acids in the blood from having less PUFA stores, as. compared to Option X.
During the 4 years, Option X can already eat plenty of white sugar and drink regular Coke (assuming the only reason he has blood sugar problems is because of PUFA blocking sugar absorption and metabolism) while Option Y has to manage his poor sugar metabolism by eating complex carbohydrates that include fiber to keep his blood sugar from swinging high and low, keeping his blood sugar stable.
After 4 years though, Option X still has to go with aspirin and niacinamide to manage his high PUFA stores, while Option Y is not needing such crutches anymore.
Instant gratification vs. working to earn a 4 yr. diploma in good sugar metabolism is a choice.
Note; Vitamin E intake during the 4 years is highly suggested for Option Y.
Good points.
There are two camps then, as I see it, w/r to dealing with PUFA stores in the body on the way to getting rid of them as much as possible.
Both agree on going cold turkey on PUFA in order to keep from accumulating more, or trying as much since we can't avoid it totally. With the goal of eventually having low enough PUFA FFAs in the blood that does not interfere significantly with sugar metabolism and low oxidative stress from the prevention of lipid peroxidation.
Option X involves taking aspirin and niacinamide for the purpose of inhibiting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation.
Option Y involves none of that.
Option X gives instant results as far as improving sugar metabolism while Option Y requires waiting 4 years.
Option Y allows one to get rid of PUFA stores in a big way (significant doesn't have that impact) after 4 years of slowly using it up daily while with Option X more PUFA stores remain.
During the 4 years, Option X minimizes lipid peroxidaton while Option Y doesn't. Though after 4 years, the situation changes as with Option Y, there is a lot of PUFA stores reduction, and Option Y begins to have less PUFA fatty acids in the blood from having less PUFA stores, as. compared to Option X.
During the 4 years, Option X can already eat plenty of white sugar and drink regular Coke (assuming the only reason he has blood sugar problems is because of PUFA blocking sugar absorption and metabolism) while Option Y has to manage his poor sugar metabolism by eating complex carbohydrates that include fiber to keep his blood sugar from swinging high and low, keeping his blood sugar stable.
After 4 years though, Option X still has to go with aspirin and niacinamide to manage his high PUFA stores, while Option Y is not needing such crutches anymore.
Instant gratification vs. working to earn a 4 yr. diploma in good sugar metabolism is a choice.
Note; Vitamin E intake during the 4 years is highly suggested for Option Y.
I said I agreed with you, implied by "good points."Niacinamide and aspirin will never entirely eliminate fatty acid oxidation. So in both options fatty acids will still continue to oxidize.
Even in your model with aspirin and niacinamide blocking fatty acid oxidation entirely (it doesn't
I said I agreed with you, implied by "good points."
How did you interpret otherwise though?
But inhibition is not meant to be understood as blocking entirely.Your arguments implied, atleast to me, the idea of inhibition of fatty acid oxidation, thats why I prefaced with that statement.
Option Y allows one to get rid of PUFA stores in a big way (significant doesn't have that impact) after 4 years of slowly using it up daily while with Option X more PUFA stores remain.
What about Option Z: fat free diet?
PUFA Depletion Can (probably) Be Accomplished In 30 Days!
Since removing PUFA from the body is one of the primary goals of Peatarians, naturally anything that can speed up the process of waiting at least 4 years would be highly desirable. I have been experimenting myself relentlessly with speeding that process up (as safely as possible). While...raypeatforum.com
Of course, but the idea is to do it for just a short period, like a fast.Saturated fats are absolutely essential to health, for hormone production among other things.
I see how that can happen. I'm just glad that I didn't have to choose between Option X and Option Y. Otherwise I would have chosen Option X. I just did Option Y one day, and practically let time fly by. I wasn't keeping time, but 4 years or more passed, and I tested myself by taking a teaspoon honey in between meals, and felt energized instead of blood sugar low shortly. Did the same with white sugar, and same effect. Then skipped lunch and didn't feel sugar low sick when I used to. Then fasted a whole day with stable blood sugar within optimal range, when I couldn't do it before. That's when I realized what I described as Option Y works.actually misread what you said Yerrag. I thought you said that "option X would get rid of PUFA stores in a big way". That why my assumption was that you were implying with option X you would move PUFA through glucoronidation. With the rate I thought you were ascribing to option X for PUFA depletion, I didnt think the glucoronidation explanation was feasible.
I'm not sure it needed to be more complicated than having two choices. I can't see much of a gray area unless you count different doses of aspirin and niacinamide as being additional choices.Even with all that said, I still dont think its that cut and dry; but the general idea is on point.
It would be more of a spectrum I'd say and less of a "this option or that option".
That wouldn't hurt as this video of CMJ supports what you say:I think the ideal scenario would be to include all the components I discussed in my post, but in the right amounts for the individual.
Ray says it's important to reduce puffa rather slowly. It's been a long time but as I recall it should take 3 or 4 years. And you never get rid of every bit. And our diets will always have some pufa. So, don't be in a hurry. Slow and steady with mistakes but trudging on.Pros: turbo pufa depletion
Cons: ???
I've no idea. Hopefully somebody more knowledgeable chimes in
do you think food products, like even milk, had 0 or very little pufa in the past?Ray says it's important to reduce puffa rather slowly. It's been a long time but as I recall it should take 3 or 4 years. And you never get rid of every bit. And our diets will always have some pufa. So, don't be in a hurry. Slow and steady with mistakes but trudging on.
That's an interesting thought isn't it. I don't have the foggiest. On the pufa, in today's milk choices, I remember he said the nutrients in milk make it an acceptable tradeoff. It does make sense that milk in the past had much less or 0 pufa.do you think food products, like even milk, had 0 or very little pufa in the past?
like even 100% grass fed milk, is mostly saturated/mufa but still 3% pufa right? which means if youve got 50g of milkfat or butter or cream its gonna be 1.5g pufa?
do you think the pufa proportion was lower, and SFA portion was higher in the past, and this is why humans in the past lived much longer?
the modern milk and beef fats, thanks to the cows ability to saturate PUFA they eat, even on heavily soy fed corn fed cows their fat is only like 6% PUFA, and like 50/44 split of sfa/mufa. if its 100% grass fed cows, pufa seems to lower to maybe 3% of the overall milk fat, which would give you around 1.5g pufa per 50g of fat from milk which is low enoughThat's an interesting thought isn't it. I don't have the foggiest. On the pufa, in today's milk choices, I remember he said the nutrients in milk make it an acceptable tradeoff. It does make sense that milk in the past had much less or 0 pufa.
Helpful. Thank you for this info.the modern milk and beef fats, thanks to the cows ability to saturate PUFA they eat, even on heavily soy fed corn fed cows their fat is only like 6% PUFA, and like 50/44 split of sfa/mufa. if its 100% grass fed cows, pufa seems to lower to maybe 3% of the overall milk fat, which would give you around 1.5g pufa per 50g of fat from milk which is low enough