misery guts
Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Messages
- 128
I think that's often because masculine features on a woman, or feminine features on a man, will be unattractive for them, but will likely confer beauty on to their opposite gendered children.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
High IQ children are more likely to wind up never mating or having strange mental problems like homosexuality.
Oh no, does that mean I have to be on the lookout for the faux kippah balding pattern, too?:)I just don't know very many people I guess and I also used to have beautiful blond hair
Oh no, does that mean I have to be on the lookout for the faux kippah balding pattern, too?:)
Shampoo with chamomile teaNo I mean it turned into the color of wet dirt at the age of ten.
Shampoo with chamomile tea
Rich people have kids later in life because they life in wealthy, highly competitive regions, with high wages. Modern high-IQ wages make late reproduction economically advantageous. Notably smart people move to Hong Kong or Stockholm or London or NYC and then wait until late in life to have one or two kids, if they reproduce at all.
High IQ is dysgenic in the modern industrialized world. High IQ children are more likely to wind up never mating or having strange mental problems like homosexuality. I saw some survey showing most MIT grad school students are virgins. High IQ people convince themselves of many stupid ideas that obviously reduce their reproductive fitness and also that of their children.
The headline of this thread confirms how modern industrialized society itself is dysgenic. The most able are rationally disincentived from reproduction. Because they can earn so much more by waiting, and also because dumb people are highly incentivized by welfare programs to reproduce. It's a ridiculous stretch to reach for some sort of hormonal/biological lens to make sense of the headline when heredity and economics/sociology work perfectly.
IQ testing finds that growing up in urban areas raises IQ. This of course leads to the conclusion that city dwellers must be smarter than the rural types. This is actually the essential force behind the so-called Flynn Effect, as global society has undergone mass urbanization over the last 100 years. Personally, I think what's really going on is that if you ask a well adjusted rural kid which colored shape doesn't belong in the set of weird colored shapes he'll tell you to **** off because it's a stupid question, and so he scores a wrong answer. The over-stimulated urban kid, however, has been bombarded with this artificial nonsense for years, and he picks the "right" shape.
Having kids as young as practical is almost certainly best. This study is dumb. It's really about how screwed up our societies are.
I thought it looked nice.Doesn't that just color it yellow?
It's about abstract reasoning, being able to make connections between things which, on the surface of it, are unrelated. I imagine this skill is a prerequisite to having original thoughts and synthesising ideas at an advanced level.Let's take a sample of IQ questions and try to analyse it:
Find the answer that best completes the analogy:
Book is to Reading as Fork is to:
a. drawing
b. writing
c. stirring
d. eating
f. f***ing
The answer is: d; eating. Fork is to eating is like book is to reading.
How exactly is eating with a fork analogous to reading a book.
Sounds like the kind of argument you'd have with your everyday retard or some underemployed philosophy major.
Yes, I think you got it right, presumably.It's about abstract reasoning, being able to make connections between things which, on the surface of it, are unrelated. I imagine this skill is a prerequisite to having original thoughts and synthesising ideas at an advanced level.
Like wide square faces on women?I think that's often because masculine features on a woman, or feminine features on a man, will be unattractive for them, but will likely confer beauty on to their opposite gendered children.
Yes, I think you got it right, presumably.
Book relates to reading just like fork relates to eating.
In that sense, both instances relate to each other because each contains an action that relates to an object.
D is the correct answer but you still can use a book for reading just like you can use a fork for stirring or a book for eating.
I'm sure there's a genius out there who'd find a way to make a better use of a fork in writing.
You can write, draw, eat and stir with it.
According to the question above, this guy should get 4 times his IQ score .
One thing Peat actually said:
A bigger head to body ratio makes people seem more attractive/cute.