ddjd
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2014
- Messages
- 6,738
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Reminds one of the stories surrounding Fenbendazole - Wikipedia and its anti cancer effects.
Have you ever listened to Zach Bush talking about how bacteria were found in breast cancer biopsy samples which correlated with better outcomes? Start at 15:30 (By infectious, i mean causative: of cancer.
If you kill the infectious agent, you kill the tumor.
Almost all anti infectious substances seem to have some anti cancer effects, starting with antibiotics, as Haidut posted.
I can attest to this use for artemisinin. My husband has used it for prostatitis. Also, he's used it to deal with a problem he had with small blood clots in his urine. He reported recently that it helped so that clots, if any, are barely visible after using it for a week or so. I'm keeping him on it for a while more. Artemisinin is non-prescription in the US. So far...check PubMed "ivermectin prostate"....Artemisinin can help w your prostate issues.
Have you ever listened to Zach Bush talking about how bacteria were found in breast cancer biopsy samples which correlated with better outcomes? Start at 15:30 (
View: https://shows.acast.com/64753e790754340012f0ff9e/64753e82c37b5d0011d2c810
) What if the infection is there because an irritant is there. What if by stopping the infection you're stopping the healing. What if the the infection is the bodies last ditch effort to rid itself of toxicity because the body is unable (with its current energetic state) to rid itself of said irritant. And what if when one stops the infection they stop an inflammatory event, temporarily, only to have it resume years later since the main offender has not been eliminated, a so called "relapse."
yes but for how long are these people "cured". it makes sense to do those type of interventions to gain some time and figure out what the main irritant is (because you are eliminating localized inflammatory activity), but i have a hard time believing its the fault of the bacteria or so called virus. these organisms have been around far longer than the current cancer pandemic making it next to impossible for them to suddenly start causing one of the most perplexing maladies ever known. Usually a (truly) novel disease has a novel cause.Everything's possible.
Virginia Livingstone's entire life was dedicated to treating cancer by using immunotherapy directed at the cancer microbe she had discovered in every type of cancer.
Naessens and Rife invented microscopes able to see them in their natural state.
There are scores and scores of doctors and scientists who have linked cancer to the presence of bacterias/viruses.
i have a hard time believing its the fault of the bacteria or so called virus. .
I gave context to the belief, its not simply that i dont believe like its some sort of religion. You believe those researchers proved it without any doubts, im providing doubts.It's not a question of belief: these researchers have proven it without any doubts.
Whether one uses radio waves to destroy these micro organisms or immunotherapy, it puts cancer patients in remission.
I gave context to the belief, its not simply that i dont believe like its some sort of religion. You believe those researchers proved it without any doubts, im providing doubts.
Reminds one of the stories surrounding Fenbendazole - Wikipedia and its anti cancer effects.