ken
Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2012
- Messages
- 288
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Once again, classic Big Pharma manipulation - combine a good drug with a bad one and when there is no benefit claim the good drug is also bad and thus kill any incentive for further research.
@ken, you really need to change your avatar. Yer makin' me hungry.
Interestingly, most of the subjects that benefited were in eastern European study sites. Apparently they aren't getting what we call standard care. Forbes says that another alzheimer trial had it's most positive results there also.
Fifteen percent of the nine hundred in the trial is about 135 subjects. Although taurx says they have another trial that the results have not been released.
Hospital consultants currently treat alzheimer patients with the mindset of being more manageable for caregivers,somehow the caregivers/family believe the consultant is trying to stabilise the decline.
I know of a consutant who treats alzheimer patients and also is a heart "specialist" ,sees around 150 patients possibly more, throws random pills at everyone. He has been asked 4 times by the family as to why he treats with serotonin enhancing pills when he has not once checked serotonin levels in the blood, "we don't generally do that", yet at the start they claim to give a full blood work up,.
When asked to measure hormones a similar response, "we don't really know the levels of progesterone and other hormones for elderly patients". They check T4 and have no interest in anything else thyroid related.
Said consultant gives zero fcuks and remains stoic as balls at all times while dishing out the latest snake oil,goes sailing at weekends, sociopath.
Had to go there, didn't ya?Shrimp wonton with barbecue duck.
That's pretty much the attitude of every doctor I have ever met. The ones that do care initially very quickly get hardened as it is impossible to make money and pay off your loans unless you prescribe pills like a dealer. Those are also the ones that commit suicide about a decade into the practice - i.e. the ones who initially cared and got callous. The sociopaths seemingly do fine initially but have much higher rate of cancer than the general population and are much less likely to survive it. Look up death stats on older doctors - these are generally the sociopaths who survived the "pill mill" initially - they pretty much all died from cancer. Having sociopathic attitude is very pro-cancer, probably due to the serotonergic dominance. Unfortunately, altruism and generosity are associated with CVD and suicide due to the stress these people endure from our modern absolutely sick society.
Is this the study where they were taking 30mgx3/day and 60mgx3/day (and also some higher doses, I think, and the 60mgx3/day was the most effective)...?
Dear Haidut, I wrote to you about the elderly Mother rat who developed rapid alzheimer's and severe edema after she was administered ferrous sulfate. Subsequently, I found your interview regarding Dementia. I took notes wrt your recommendations to start: aspirin, MB, niacinamide, pregnenolone, progesterone, DHEA, taurine, saturated fats, K2 (MK-4) and the A,D,E, K2 synergy. As well, I was since able to read voluminous amounts of your amazing insights here. And see that this is the best place to follow. I look forward to trying estroban, energin and others and report feedback on the Mother rat's progress. However, I learned that my lab assistants continue to feed PUFA, ensure, honeywheat bread, club crackers, deli meats. So, I'll have to work on controlling the experiment better. Thank you.No it didn't. It failed in people who were also taking officially approved drugs for AD, most of which are cholinergic and thus very very toxic. In the people who were NOT taking any other drugs methylene blue worked.
"...But in a perplexing twist, the drug did show a significant benefit in about 15 percent of patients in the trial who were not taking other standard Alzheimer's drugs, according to the findings released on Wednesday at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference in Toronto."
Once again, classic Big Pharma manipulation - combine a good drug with a bad one and when there is no benefit claim the good drug is also bad and thus kill any incentive for further research.