not_James_Bond
Member
Yeah, and every Year it'll be like >That guarantees that they'll never figure it out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Yeah, and every Year it'll be like >That guarantees that they'll never figure it out.
Jon Rappoport points out that in a lot of studies of conditions like this, they will use the term "previously healthy," even if the person had dealt with a disease like cancer. He came to the conclusion that "previously healthy" is simply a technical term that means "previously not dead."I was expecting to read "up until this point, his health was immaculate. He got his flu shot every year, ate low fat, and kept an eye on his cholesterol."
In all seriousness though, he should get on this forum and start digging himself out
Why? You know that money is wasted, just like all government funded health research.Lets hope they get it right.
No its not. The great majority of research is worthless,true, but gems always slip throug, especially when one looks at the materials-methods + raw data. Studies are valuable, and even Ray relies heavily on them, citing a lot of evidence for his claims.Why? You know that money is wasted, just like all government funded health research.
True, because they are funded by entities with an agenda. Namely, Pharma companies and the Federal Government.There is a lot we still don't know about, and there are many honest and smart people in biotech, Pharma and medicine, they just don't get the opportunity to share and explore their ideas.
Lol, ain't that the truth.That guarantees that they'll never figure it out.
good point. I always read "previously healthy" ...and then you see a picture of them and itsJon Rappoport points out that in a lot of studies of conditions like this, they will use the term "previously healthy," even if the person had dealt with a disease like cancer. He came to the conclusion that "previously healthy" is simply a technical term that means "previously not dead."
to be fair, anyone born in America in the past 50 years is not optimally healthy. The amount of heavy metals, adjuvants, pufa, added iron, formula feed, pesticides, herbicides, BPA, other plastics, xenoestrogens that everyone is exposed to starting in the womb makes almost every American in some way unhealthy, and at somewhat of a risk of having a bad reaction bacterial and viral infections. I still find it odd how so many on this fourm brush off peoples stories by claiming they're just unhealthy, when all of us are to a large degree unhealthy and our tissues have toxins in them at all times from previous stresses and current.
well 40% of americans are obese, 70% overweight/obese, and i would guess probsbly 90% low thyroid, with 100% of people being exposed to pufa, adjuvants, and other things. so right off the bat that's a risk factor for complications from it. the 99.98% recovery rate is highly disputed and in some places it's quite higher. Yea most people will be fine, but multiple people on this forum have had very severe reactions so it's just odd that people brush it off as benign.In regards to what, Covid?
Even with all of the things you mention, it's still a 99.98% recovery rate for those under 70. Even if the health of the general pop is sub par (compared to history), it's still not a significant threat to the current day average person.
And it's not an isolated example. The only place where "Antibiotic Resistant Superbugs" are a threat is within a hospital.
Just because a person isn't "optimally healthy," it doesn't mean they are suffering from terminal cancer or bedridden, either.
Except that Obesity seems to be "protective" against COVID 19.well 40% of americans are obese, 70% overweight/obese, and i would guess probsbly 90% low thyroid. so right off the bat that's a risk factor for complications from it. the 99.98% recovery rate is highly disputed and in some places it's quite higher.
hah. stunt-double lungsLol, her lungs appeared on the PBS News Hour? Guess even her vital organs are an actress.
The picture on the left are someone else's lungs, not Milano's. Maybe the middle image are what hers normally look like. Let's see a picture of her lungs before, then we can judge.
I was thinking this exactly.Sounds like textbook ME/CFS with a viral onset. it can be brought on by many different viruses. If public health agencies and medical professionals hadn't been ignoring the millions of us with this disease for decades, they would know more about it by now.
Yes, I think so too.It's a clear cut case of ME/CFS probably with POTS, precipitated by some virus and predisposed by a high stress lifestyle.
The guys life is crumbling around him, understandable that he would have breakdowns. I hope he finds a competent doctor that can prescribe symptomatic treatment so that he can have a semi-normal life.