Amazoniac
Member
burtlan, as far as I know, for legal reasons a researcher that's not a physician can't scrutinize a medical protocol in its entirety especially to suggest modifications. On top of that, his protocol is mostly based on experimentation; so, it's hard for a researcher to challenge a protocol that works as a whole and that wasn't based on studies; mostly because technically there's not much to confront. If things were to be tested in people with cancer, he would need a physician involved anyway. But on the other hand, as a researcher, he could explain the protocol scientifically, as a review, so that it's understandable how it works, and easier for other doctors to approach and perceive what could be improved. This is what you wished, right? If so, it would indeed be very positive.
#burtlanaseduceraloveraconqueroravisionaryandawinner
#burtlanaseduceraloveraconqueroravisionaryandawinner
Last edited: