tankasnowgod
Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2014
- Messages
- 8,131
But they took the preventive measures to minimize risks of adverse effects that can happen below frank toxicity.
I didn't consider bone density a bad thing, have you read the last comment? Not a rhetorical question, you might have missed.
On the exceptional group it's probable that the needs for everything keep increasing as well, it's unlikely that magnesium and K2 are enough to confer full protection or cover the extra requirement for putting things in order.
Well, it could have been the preventative measures..... or it could be, as they stated, that blood levels below 300 ng/ml are unlikely to cause toxicity. As far as reading the "last comment," I do not know what you are referring too.
Also, this is the wrong thread for this discussion. I created a thread specifically about this, you should be posting these concerns there
- Supplementing More Than 10,000 IU Of Vitamin D A Day Based On The Work Of Jeff Bowles
I'd appreciate you bringing up new info and concerns there, but please stop re-hashing the same evidence you posted a couple times already.