Extracellular vesicles and viruses: Are they close relatives?
It seems to me that virologists don't want to do the obvious and control for differentiated toxicity(see my other thread with the Korean toxicology paper).
It's obvious that there is not viruses. They talk about the difficulty of separating virions from EVs, the problem is there is no precedent of ANY kind of qualitative separation of a virus clear on back to the very first one TMV. The parsimonious conclusion to draw from the failure of Koch's postulates as well as fulfilling the old electron microscope based protocol which is based on Koch's postulates is that vesicles are all there are and is as far as viral activity goes.
The differentiating factor is clearly stress and toxicity not an exogenous viral agent.
It seems to me that virologists don't want to do the obvious and control for differentiated toxicity(see my other thread with the Korean toxicology paper).
It's obvious that there is not viruses. They talk about the difficulty of separating virions from EVs, the problem is there is no precedent of ANY kind of qualitative separation of a virus clear on back to the very first one TMV. The parsimonious conclusion to draw from the failure of Koch's postulates as well as fulfilling the old electron microscope based protocol which is based on Koch's postulates is that vesicles are all there are and is as far as viral activity goes.
The differentiating factor is clearly stress and toxicity not an exogenous viral agent.