Cirion
Member
After some more brainstorming, I came up with a new parameter. It's challenging to try to optimize body temp and pulse rate as separate parameters. So I thought about it, and decided to combine both into a brand new parameter... no fancy smancy name so for now just calling it a "Fitness Function" but basically the idea is this:
% Of Optimal Body temp = Body Temp / 98.6
% Of Optimal Pulse Rate = Pulse Rate / 85
If the % is greater than 100%, then I truncate it to 100%. Also I found out that relatively speaking, the % of pulse rate varied from 70-100% whereas the body temp only varied from like 98-100%. To normalize things, I had to take the body temp ratio to an exponential, such that my worst recorded temps (97.6) were equal to 70% also. Then I basically multiply these %'s together, to come up with a fitness, or overall "Metabolic Marker" parameter, the goal of this is to make this value 100% or as close as possible. I will be putting a few plots together that show trends with this new parameter. I've already done a few and I like what I'm seeing using this, so I'll probably be using this moving forward, will post some more tomorrow.
An example: If I got a score of 80% on both temp and pulse, my overall metabolic score would be 80%*80% or 64%.
Here is a fun one to start it off (2-day rolling avg. plots, as I stil have not scored a single 100 with 3-day avg plots yet, I have to use these to work my way up to a 3 day and beyond)
Clearly, the ONLY time I have ever gotten a perfect 100 was with about 4,500 calories so this should probably be where I focus on caloric intake.
Macros:
% Plots
Just more validation for Ultra Low fat (only 100 perfect score), and low protein (Or at least focusing on very low acidity diet in general) & ultra high carb.
Intake (in grams)
% Of Optimal Body temp = Body Temp / 98.6
% Of Optimal Pulse Rate = Pulse Rate / 85
If the % is greater than 100%, then I truncate it to 100%. Also I found out that relatively speaking, the % of pulse rate varied from 70-100% whereas the body temp only varied from like 98-100%. To normalize things, I had to take the body temp ratio to an exponential, such that my worst recorded temps (97.6) were equal to 70% also. Then I basically multiply these %'s together, to come up with a fitness, or overall "Metabolic Marker" parameter, the goal of this is to make this value 100% or as close as possible. I will be putting a few plots together that show trends with this new parameter. I've already done a few and I like what I'm seeing using this, so I'll probably be using this moving forward, will post some more tomorrow.
An example: If I got a score of 80% on both temp and pulse, my overall metabolic score would be 80%*80% or 64%.
Here is a fun one to start it off (2-day rolling avg. plots, as I stil have not scored a single 100 with 3-day avg plots yet, I have to use these to work my way up to a 3 day and beyond)
Clearly, the ONLY time I have ever gotten a perfect 100 was with about 4,500 calories so this should probably be where I focus on caloric intake.
Macros:
% Plots
Just more validation for Ultra Low fat (only 100 perfect score), and low protein (Or at least focusing on very low acidity diet in general) & ultra high carb.
Intake (in grams)
Last edited: