Sorry that I lost sight of the very useful and helpful part of what you were telling me Amazoniac.I've never denied your infection, my point is that adopting the mindset of an infected person through reinforcement makes you prone to take more uncalculated measures. It starts to be all about lysing to the detriment of the rest. In my arrongant opinion, before enzyme medication, the first questioning should be how these are metabolized and affect normal tissues, which you didn't investigate.
¿
It's puzzling how you shun such a relevant article.
Well, here's one case that had them elevated:
- Administration of serratiopeptidase lead to increase in spread of space infection
Sometimes chronic infections are best dealt with slowly and interventions of this kind just as an adjuvant therapy to your immunity (which is supposed to do most of the work). An example is the C. pneumoniae protocol that requires low doses of doxycycline over a longer period. Perhaps something similar applies to these enzymes so that they don't become overwhelming.
What you are saying affirms what I had learned the hard way using proteolytic enzymes recently. The gentler lysing using Zymessence- a blend - than using straight serrapeptidase- in a large dose especially - have far different effects.
There is nothing wrong with using these enzymes in and of itself, it's in how they are used. With better knowledge and experience, I can use them in a better way. Knowing that bacteria is released as the lysing of plaque is occurring, accompanying the enzyme intake with antibiotic would be very helpful.
I would like to say that the use of enzymes to lyse plaque is not the first approach I would recommend anyone to take. In problem solving, start with the easier solutions. If the easier solutions are given enough time to do their work and still don't, the possibility of plaque shouldn't be ignored. This is my situation.
Not all plaque are like mine. Mine happens to be the result of chronic bacterial infection from a periodontal infection left untreated for 15+ years because it was not detected all that time. This plaque harbors bacteria.
Both the plaque and the bacteria contribute to my hypertension. The plaque constricts blood flow and also lowers blood volume. The bacteria causes the immune system to rob nitric oxide needed for vasodilation- in order to protect the body from the more immediate harm.
Not all plaque have bacteria accompanying them. They are easier to deal with. In all likelihood, these kind of plaque may be removed more easily. And maybe even in a faster way with a stronger enzyme dose- with none of the effects I experienced. No strong immune response. No excessive urination.
But caution is needed. Paying close attention to signs is important. In my case, I monitored my WBC, neutrophils, and RDW - all available from an old-fashioned blood test called CBC. And because it's not expensive, I can do a weekly monitoring of it. I could do it daily very affodably as well, but I don't want my veins needled that much.
I'm not sure in what manner I would take antibacterials to get an effective dose without it becoming excessive and elicit another untoward response, so if you can help with some suggestions I would appreciate it.
I called it antibacterial instead of. antibiotics, because I don't want to exclude natural. antibiotics such as oil of oregano or colloidal silver, but doxycycline and minocycline is on top of my list.
Last edited: