Yes, it is amazing that people believe there is election fraud.
There is but one freak show in our forum. Amazed!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Yes, it is amazing that people believe there is election fraud.
Yes, it is amazing that people believe there is election fraud.
Proving fraud requires proving intent though.
Trump is a criminal, he was responsible and the cause for prosecuting Assange, the hero father of two. He deserves a death sentence for bombing innocent people.You should be banned for your constant slander of the President. @charlie
Yes, Trump should have dropped charges against Assange and Snowden. I am very disappointed he won't do that. But...Trump is a criminal, he was responsible and the cause for prosecuting Assange, the hero father of two. He deserves a death sentence for bombing innocent people.
"When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals.” - Edward Snowden
Trump is a terrorist.
BTW, a unexpected and nice position from Tarmander.
Yes, Trump should have dropped charges against Assange and Snowden. I am very disappointed he won't do that. But...
Do you think Biden will do any different? I think Biden will do as Obama did and what Hillary would have done.
But I'd wager you that under Trump, there is at least hope that charges against Assange and Snowden would be dropped. Fat chance Biden would do that.
Biden politics seems more far-right currently, he is worse. Trump has at least some "populism" in his rhetoric and propaganda, but Trump is the puppet of a eugenicist side which is greater and is winning wars against the Rockefellers and Co. So Biden winning will bring more equilibrium, no one wants an even bigger oligarchy even worse if unopposed. Some competition at the cream of the elite is better to have than one side winning it all.Yes, Trump should have dropped charges against Assange and Snowden. I am very disappointed he won't do that. But...
Do you think Biden will do any different? I think Biden will do as Obama did and what Hillary would have done.
But I'd wager you that under Trump, there is at least hope that charges against Assange and Snowden would be dropped. Fat chance Biden would do that.
Biden politics seems more far-right currently, he is worse. Trump has at least some "populism" in his rhetoric and propaganda, but Trump is the puppet of a eugenicist side which is greater and is winning wars against the Rockefellers and Co. So Biden winning will bring more equilibrium, no one wants an even bigger oligarchy. Some competition at the cream of the elite is better to have than one side winning it all.
If Trump wins, he will be seen as a hero, giving the context against him, his followers will be more fanatical about him and if he carries the support of the military/ deep state; you can easily expect a dictatorship by the executive branch. If not then, Rothschild will easily rule.
Propaganda against the Rockefellers' agenda is easier to find than against the Rothschild. Both are nasty in different ways, with similar consequences.
Is @Regina alike the sites against fake news and conspiracies here?
President Trump is a 1960's style democrat without any of the war mongering. Not my cup of tea, excepting the war mongering, as those liberals eventually morphed into the big government, power hungry, child hating, race hating, self loathing, psycho cretins you leftists turned out to be.As for Trump, I don't think he is going away anytime soon, and I don't think he is likely to be replaced. He is the definition of "cult of personality"
We can consolidate hope if we have some revolution, which currently is much more difficult than Kill the King. Rebellion gets stronger as strangely happened successfully in Denmark, to some degree. Or if we at least democratize the central banks, taking some power from the likes of CEDE & Co. which is ruled mostly by the Rockefellers and the Rothschild.Interesting take of this as somehow like a proxy war between Rotschild and Rockefeller.
But I see this more as a war between hope and assured rot and decay.
What happened successfully in Denmark?We can consolidate hope if we have some revolution, which currently is much more difficult than Kill the King. Rebellion gets stronger as strangely happened successfully in Denmark, to some degree. Or if we at least democratize the central banks, taking some power from the likes of CEDE & Co. which is ruled mostly by the Rockefellers and the Rothschild.
Or if we force transparency against the politicians or against the mainstream media. @yerrag complete
This is where the democrats strategy was absolutely brilliant. Brainwash an army of "by any means necessary" followers who will do anything to get rid of Trump who they believe is like Hitler. Then remove the checks and balances required to detect fraud. Then gaslight the American people into believing election fraud is really rare. Then mail out excessive ballots everywhere. Then print extra ballots and leave them in places where they can be found. Make sure there are a minimal amount of surveillance cameras monitoring all the ballots. Make sure the ballots don't have unique barcodes that will prevent them from being fed through the machine more than once. Then leave it to the army of "by any means necessary" to find all the extra ballots and to do what is necessary to get enough ballots through the system to win the election in the close states. When this strategy is not enough to win, shut down the election in all the swing states to find more fraudulent votes until enough are found to win. Broadcast on the media what Trump's lead is so the "by any means necessary" followers can work harder to find more ballots.
Every single step required to steal this election has built in plausible deniability. The democrats engineered a system to steal the election where no single person could be caught except maybe a handful of low level "by any means necessary" followers. But when these individuals are caught they can just say, "but it's not enough votes to swing the election."
We have witnessed the perfect crime.
What happened successfully in Denmark?
I think that rallying around a figurehead in Trump is easier than trying to create a movement that does all that you speak of. The hope is that a Trump reelection will set the stage for a future realignment of forces favorable to your cause. You've seen how Occupy Wall Street fell apart so easily before. It starts with getting an overhaul under Trump. Without that, the deep state will keep blocking needed reforms.
We will have to move on from being focused on fighting the race war, and into setting our sights into defining the conflict instead as a class conflict. For too long the MSM has been diverting attention to race divisions, in order to keep us from working on improving distribution of income across classes. Try to make the current structure work towards this goal rather than breaking up the structure. The way the country and its institutions are set up isn't the problem, it is in the way they way been corrupted.
I agree mostly.
Very important now is to harness the 50-70 million of Americans that believe that there was election fraud.
These people need to resolve first to never acknowledge Joe Biden as the legitimate President. If he takes office, people should always resist his policies and call him out as the illegitimate felon he is.
It’s the foremost patriotic - but more important - liberal, democratic duty of every citizen to engage in peaceful opposition. Call Biden and his cronies out at every moment, call the media out thar carry this coup.
And in 4 years make a fanal of civil, peaceful resistance and elect a candidate of personal (reasonable) integrity. If such a one exists in the field of candidates that can emerge.
I personally wouldn’t want to see Trump or the Trumps too much involved anymore apart from campaigning
Already we can see signs of cooperation between Republicans and Democrats that have a populist suasion, from people such as Matt Gaetz, Rand Paul, Ro Khanna, and Tulsi Gabbard. And we also see rejection of opportunistic faux populists such as Elizabeth Warren and even Bernie Sanders. It is not farfetched to see the left and right unite against the neocons and neoliberals.
This is where the democrats strategy was absolutely brilliant. Brainwash an army of "by any means necessary" followers who will do anything to get rid of Trump who they believe is like Hitler. Then remove the checks and balances required to detect fraud. Then gaslight the American people into believing election fraud is really rare. Then mail out excessive ballots everywhere. Then print extra ballots and leave them in places where they can be found. Make sure there are a minimal amount of surveillance cameras monitoring all the ballots. Make sure the ballots don't have unique barcodes that will prevent them from being fed through the machine more than once. Then leave it to the army of "by any means necessary" to find all the extra ballots and to do what is necessary to get enough ballots through the system to win the election in the close states. When this strategy is not enough to win, shut down the election in all the swing states to find more fraudulent votes until enough are found to win. Broadcast on the media what Trump's lead is so the "by any means necessary" followers can work harder to find more ballots.
Every single step required to steal this election has built in plausible deniability. The democrats engineered a system to steal the election where no single person could be caught except maybe a handful of low level "by any means necessary" followers. But when these individuals are caught they can just say, "but it's not enough votes to swing the election."
We have witnessed the perfect crime.
It just shows you how stupid the booger eating general population is that they'll turn a blind eye to it because it doesn't affect their candidate in this particular race.
I forgot to mention leading up to the race the media was gaslighting the American people into believing checks and balances to prevent fraud are meant to disenfranchise minority voters. Republicans are so afraid of false accusations of racism that they didn't fight to put the checks and balances back in place.