Hgreen56
Member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2020
- Messages
- 723
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
isn't it just because drinking liters of whole milk will very quickly make you fat?Either you learn about all the confounding factors not thought about in these junk studies, or you stop drinking milk.
The only issue i have with RP:s milk recommendation is that he prefers skim or low fat over whole milk. When proper studies where you truly control for one variable (milk fat content) universally show harm from reduced fat milk compared to whole.
Only because it is extremely palatable for the energy content. If you don't overfeed you won't get fat. Simply replace other fats in your diet with the milk fat you will be consuming.isn't it just because drinking liters of whole milk will very quickly make you fat?
I think peats view is that the milk is drank for whatever is in the water soluble phase and that whole milk is more fattening. He seems to believe in calorie restriction not being unimportant in regards to weight gain/weight lossOnly because it is extremely palatable for the energy content. If you don't overfeed you won't get fat. Simply replace other fats in your diet with the milk fat you will be consuming.
I grew up on relatively large 1% milk consumption. When i switched to whole milk and slightly increased amount, started thinking of it as food not drink, only good things followed. The opposite of gaining fat, in fact it seemed like fat mass turned into muscle mass all on it's own. This effect is even more pronounced with beef fat.
Doesn’t the study basically conclude that the milk was likely contaminated with organochlorine pesticides which were found “at excessively high levels in the milk supply in Hawaii in the early 1980s”?fewer dopamine neurons
not sure what to think about this.
The only issue i have with RP:s milk recommendation is that he prefers skim or low fat over whole milk. When proper studies where you truly control for one variable (milk fat content) universally show harm from reduced fat milk compared to whole.
not sure what to think about this.
Only because it is extremely palatable for the energy content. If you don't overfeed you won't get fat. Simply replace other fats in your diet with the milk fat you will be consuming.
I grew up on relatively large 1% milk consumption. When i switched to whole milk and slightly increased amount, started thinking of it as food not drink, only good things followed. The opposite of gaining fat, in fact it seemed like fat mass turned into muscle mass all on it's own. This effect is even more pronounced with beef fat.
This all was nicely confirmed in a study haidut posted where protein intake was not associated with muscle mass, but saturated fat consumption was. After all, muscles live on fat while hard work is done on glucose. Only repair needs protein.
When the dairy products were divided into milk, cheese, yogurt and ice cream, only milk remained significantly associated with an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease.
I read a study that showed PUFAs increased muscle mass. It was thought that the higher rate of lipid peroxidation damaged muscle tissue and made it grow larger as a result.Only because it is extremely palatable for the energy content. If you don't overfeed you won't get fat. Simply replace other fats in your diet with the milk fat you will be consuming.
I grew up on relatively large 1% milk consumption. When i switched to whole milk and slightly increased amount, started thinking of it as food not drink, only good things followed. The opposite of gaining fat, in fact it seemed like fat mass turned into muscle mass all on it's own. This effect is even more pronounced with beef fat.
This all was nicely confirmed in a study haidut posted where protein intake was not associated with muscle mass, but saturated fat consumption was. After all, muscles live on fat while hard work is done on glucose. Only repair needs protein.
I read a study that showed PUFAs increased muscle mass. It was thought that the higher rate of lipid peroxidation damaged muscle tissue and made it grow larger as a result.
Cholesterol and saturated fat are anabolic; PUFA/MUFA akin to chemical castration – To Extract Knowledge from MatterDo you have this study on hand by chance?
Haha yeah, it could work in the short-term, but in the long run you’d end up castrating yourself.french fries - the new weightlifting?