superhuman
Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2013
- Messages
- 1,124
Re: The Weight-Loss Miracle Discovered by Ray Peat
Thanx. How much is 0.5 grain in terms of mcg T3 and T4
Thanx. How much is 0.5 grain in terms of mcg T3 and T4
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Thyroid-S Content in one tablet (60 mg thyroid extract): approximately 38 mcg Levothyroxine (T4) and 9 mcg Liothyronine (T3)superhuman said:Thanx. How much is 0.5 grain in terms of mcg T3 and T4
Filip1993 said:"If I'm understanding uncoupling properly, it essentially causes cells to burn energy for heat instead of productive ATP generation. This seems to be correlated with reduced obesity (that's logical) and extended life span. However, shouldn't uncoupling be harmful to health because it reduces the amount of ATP being generated?"
This question was asked over at peatarian. What do you guys think about it? I think it makes sense.
Filip1993 said:@Jennifer If you have access to large quantities of high quality food it's probably safe to have a very high metabolic rate. It's going to be very expensive and time consuming though. Sometimes I feel drained when I rev up my metabolism too much.
I know I have sometimes chided the folks at peatarian for not having read Peat's work. Part of me wonders if some of them are not trolls, paid to mislead the public so that industrial plundering and degradation can continue unabated.Filip1993 said:"If I'm understanding uncoupling properly, it essentially causes cells to burn energy for heat instead of productive ATP generation. This seems to be correlated with reduced obesity (that's logical) and extended life span. However, shouldn't uncoupling be harmful to health because it reduces the amount of ATP being generated?"
This question was asked over at peatarian. What do you guys think about it? I think it makes sense.
Yes, sorry! I know that! Didn't mean to point at you, but just the folks at peatarian who might prefer to call themselves, anti-peatarian.com.Filip1993 said:I'm not an expert on the subject, hence my question. Since I don't have much time for researching myself I like to ask questions and try other peoples ideas. I just wanted to know if being "too uncoupled" might have some negative effects because of the production of heat instead of ATP. I'm not trying to argue against Peat, I'm just interested. (English is not my native language so please ignore any spelling mistakes etc.).
Thanks! Any Peat quotes for that? When or at what level does Peat say uncoupling is harmful? Or does he?Suikerbuik said:@filip1993, Sure that is possible. It is all about balance.
Suikerbuik said:Peat isn't saying much about uncoupling in specific. The system is too variable to go into specific details, hence Peat doesn't I guess. However Peat written a lot about the importance of ATP with much more context. ATP production depends of the proton gradient. As long as this is sufficient, the uncoupling isn't lowering ATP.
Such_Saturation said:It is induced by ATP plentiness.