visionofstrength
Member
Here's Peat's description of a framework of a protocol, which was the conclusion of the September newsletter:
In November, Peat's newsletter described ways to improve the GSH/GSSG ratio, and the role of methylene blue.
Now, I'm not proposing actual doses, but a framework for self-dosing these substances that Peat explicitly calls out above. Does that make sense?
Why argue whether it should be a diet or a protocol. I don't like the word diet, because I think it's negative. Diets, so far, have done vastly more harm than good, by making people cut back on eating, rather than eat more.
I think many in this forum don't eat enough, that you should be trying to eat more, up to a point of at least 3,000 calories a day (but based on bodyweight and activity), without gaining bodyfat! Until you can do that, you are not at a high metabolic rate where you need to be.
I hope one thing we can agree on is that each of us has our own personalized day-to-day diet/protocol of food and supplements that we have made for ourselves, or else we may just be binge eating and popping pills whenever the mood strikes.
And I do ask myself, what would Ray Peat do? And I think that if he had the resources I have, or truly, that we have here, that he would do just what I'm proposing, a framework for a customized, self-dosing protocol, with animations on youtube, facebook and google to get the word out, and a mobile app.
He's done a lot with very little. Now it's our turn.
Ray Peat said:Besides selecting a diet that minimizes intestinal inflammation and free fatty acids, and that provides essential amino acids without an excess of cysteine, tryptophan, and arginine, the safe antiinflammatory supplements vitamin E, aspirin, niacinamide, vitamins K and D, thyroid hormone, progesterone, pregnenolone, DHEA, and coffee help to decrease the susceptibility to stress-induced aerobic glycolysis.
In November, Peat's newsletter described ways to improve the GSH/GSSG ratio, and the role of methylene blue.
Now, I'm not proposing actual doses, but a framework for self-dosing these substances that Peat explicitly calls out above. Does that make sense?
Why argue whether it should be a diet or a protocol. I don't like the word diet, because I think it's negative. Diets, so far, have done vastly more harm than good, by making people cut back on eating, rather than eat more.
I think many in this forum don't eat enough, that you should be trying to eat more, up to a point of at least 3,000 calories a day (but based on bodyweight and activity), without gaining bodyfat! Until you can do that, you are not at a high metabolic rate where you need to be.
I hope one thing we can agree on is that each of us has our own personalized day-to-day diet/protocol of food and supplements that we have made for ourselves, or else we may just be binge eating and popping pills whenever the mood strikes.
And I do ask myself, what would Ray Peat do? And I think that if he had the resources I have, or truly, that we have here, that he would do just what I'm proposing, a framework for a customized, self-dosing protocol, with animations on youtube, facebook and google to get the word out, and a mobile app.
He's done a lot with very little. Now it's our turn.