Such_Saturation
Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2013
- Messages
- 7,370
Can this please not be r/incel away from home
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
All of the controversy about the proper way of men getting with women may become moot or optional if female sexbots are indeed a revolution at our door step:
"Omega and beta males in a rut will be the primary users of sexbots. This will unleash tremendous shock waves on the sexual market, placing enormous pressure on the sub-HB7 Western woman who will experience an accelerating decline in the number of thirsty men willing to entertain her feminism, anti-femininity, and even garden variety coyness. Sexbot brothels will be the predominant service until prices drop low enough that private sexbot ownership is feasible for the masses. We are far from end game in the sterile jizz pens of the sexbot brothel."
"The entire market structure of dating will shift seismically in the direction of men becoming choosier and less willing to please and women becoming looser and more willing to please."
Sexbot Revolution Update
Sexbot Revolution Update
Sexbots
Sexbots
This just out - early warning intel that revolution mentioned above is almost here:
Austrian brothel buys a SECOND sex doll after its first became more popular with customers than real women
Austrian brothel buys a second sex doll due to high demand | Daily Mail Online
I think "HB" means "Hot Babe," and this means white women from Europe and US, and those under a 7 (1-10, 10 being hottest). See:
Updated Glossary of Terms and Acronyms • r/TheRedPill
Everything you said is true.Exit polls are not objective data. People can say anything to the pollster.
"College educated" is a useless term. There are many useless degrees that a person can have and still call themselves "educated."
The candidates are besides the point. Malkin's main point has nothing to do with HC and DT. If you take HC and DT and replace them with other people Malkin's points are still valid against MO race-baiting, identity politics and her hatred for the US.
That sounds pretty miserable, but at least it's an ancillary field. I had similar problems doing biochemistry; inorganic chemistry bores me to death, and added to an intense workload (to weed out underperformers for health-related professions), an accelerated tract, and regular labs, and I considered killing myself for a while. The information did not seem hard, but the whole experience seemed contrived and serotonergic.
If I wanted to study biology, then I would have to dip into genetics and all that autism finding the particular allele that codes for the toenail protein in the naked mole rat to employ some GTF who has an intense interest in sea anemones for some God-forsaken reason. No thanks.
Probably while thinking "why this desk is turned to me" or "get yourself a diploma so that we can responsibilize the university for your gigantic head" or "why is this guy carrying a sword? I better be nice to him"..My doctor has said repeatedly that I should enter into academia
This is why we need feminism
I believe the photo is a real "like campaign" that the guy was doing.Is that a joke? We were talking about alpha/beta males in another thread and I criticized the terms... in any event, that's a beta male lol
I believe the photo is a real "like campaign" that the guy was doing.
"To contribute to the field" actually. Sadly the field needs to be re-plowed.Probably while thinking "why this desk is turned to me" or "get yourself a diploma so that we can responsibilize the university for your gigantic head" or "why is this guy carrying a sword? I better be nice to him"..
I emailed RP to ask about hard wiring. If humans are hard wired then why do so many things go “wrong” during child birth. Part of his response includes the following:In other words it has to do with a physical wiring of the optic system. Good to know. Do bees not have abstract thought because they aren't wired that way, or because of a social construct?
I emailed RP to ask about hard wiring. If humans are hard wired then why do so many things go “wrong” during child birth. Part of his response includes the following:
I don’t think there’s any hardwiring, our whole being is involved in everything. A punitive culture starts introducing the interstitial dirt whenever it can, introducing gestures, symbols, and attitudes that build up an experience that seems to fit with the mechanical wiring ideology.
I understand what you are saying but if we are electric beings than the only parameters are our charges and skin.I think this is a false dichotomy. It's so hard to talk about this stuff over text on a forum. Just because something is physically wired to run a certain way, doesn't mean it isn't able to be altered. It's just not infinitely alterable, or able to be altered with no energy input, or a "social construct." It's a real physical system with parameters.
I guess the reaction is to older thinking that it's hard wired like plumbing, with thick steel structures that cannot be even slightly diverted in their setup.
I understand what you are saying but if we are electric beings than the only parameters are our charges and skin.
You’re comparing the body to an enclosed physical system. The variety of human expression, experience, and appearance is a testament to its alter-ability. Seems like we’re splitting hairs here. Maybe it’s soft wired instead of hard wired?Skin? That's the only tissue you believe yourself to be composed of?
Seems like we're talking past each other, and I don't understand what you're trying to say. Could you give an example of what you mean? How would you demonstrate this infinite flexibility of charge and skin?
You’re comparing the body to an enclosed physical system. The variety of human expression, experience, and appearance is a testament to its alter-ability. Seems like we’re splitting hairs here. Maybe it’s soft wired instead of hard wired?
I would say techne and technology are two completely different things. As are knowledge and understanding. If humans evolved in such a way where knowledge (mind) was gained incrementally and in relation to understanding (body) acquired, we may in fact grow wings when falling from an airplane.I am *comparing* the human body to a system in the sense that I said that the brain is wired in a particular way. I didn't say it was closed, obviously it requires external factors to work at all, and it responds to those factors.
However, there are elements of any tissue or the body as a whole that are less mutable than others. You can change your body composition through exercise, as the nervous and muscular system respond to the stressors by changing and building tissue. You cannot, however, respond to falling from an airplane (even if you somehow manage to fall for years) by growing wings.
Biological entities are like games, chess or checkers or something similar. Some are more complex, some more simple. They all have rules of what can and can't happen, but *within* that rule set there is a lot of variability. Within chess, for example, there are only 7 types of pieces and they can only move in specific ways, yet there is for practical purposes an unlimited amount of possibilities in how a chess game can play out. It can't play out, however, with you making an illegal move.
The confusion, I think, comes about because we (scientists, interested people, society in general) have incomplete knowledge of the rule set. We don't know what the possibilities are, and as a result many of the times a claim is made about an impossibility, an exception is discovered. People use that as evidence that there is no limit to possibility, but if that were true then why don't they just grow wings already?
Perhaps there is no limit to possibility when sufficient technological understanding is achieved, but that is many ages into the future. The fact that knowledge and technology in specific have to be leveraged to achieve greater possibility itself is testament to the limits of the system. A system with no limits at all wouldn't require knowledge of how to manipulate it or outside technology to change it, it could just change itself with no problem.
I would say techne and technology are two completely different things. As are knowledge and understanding. If humans evolved in such a way where knowledge (mind) was gained incrementally and in relation to understanding (body) acquired, we may in fact grow wings when falling from an airplane.
What discipline are you trained in?
Here’s an example and it may be fantastical but I’ll try:What does that mean? What are the parameters in plain language by which a human could phenomenologically grow wings to adapt to falling in real time?
Techne and epistime are different, technology has a few definitional connotations.
molecular biology and biochemistry